Bicuspidization of Mandibular Molar;A Clinical Review;Case Report
- Dr.Vivik Periodontics Dr.Mudit Uppal Endodontics
Dr. Sumona Kumar Periodontics Dr. Gurleen Arora Prosthodontics
Dr. Maryam Jameel Dental Intern
Bicuspidization of Mandibular Molar;A Clinical Review;Case Report
Dr. Sumona Kumar Periodontics Dr. Gurleen Arora Prosthodontics
Dr. Maryam Jameel Dental Intern
Dental fusion In 7 year in primary teeth
Tooth fusion is defined as the developmental dental anomaly in which two different tooth buds are fused into one during the development stage.
Introduction
In the deciduous dentition, as well as in the permanent dentition, anomalies in color, shape, size or number may occur .
Fusion is one of the many different types of developmental anomalies. It is defined as the union of two normally separated tooth germs . This anomaly leads to alterations of number, as the union results in one tooth less than normal if the affected tooth is counted as one; size, since the tooth will be much larger as it is the union of two tooth buds, and shape.
Clinically, it may be difficult to differentiate a tooth fusion from another developmental anomaly, such as gemination. Gemination is the attempt of division of a single tooth germ by invagination, resulting in the incomplete formation of two teeth This particular anomaly does not affect the normal number of teeth, as the affected tooth is counted as one.
Tooth fusion may occur within the dentin, the enamel, or both. Radiographically, these teeth are observed to have one or more root canals and one or two pulp chambers On the other hand, geminated teeth present one single root and one root canal .
This anomaly has a prevalence of 0.1-2.5% in deciduous dentition, and 0.1-0.2% in permanent dentition . There is an equal distribution between females and males, and there are no significant differences in its location, affecting either maxillary or mandibular arches
Buccal Fibroma
Dr. Ghada Amin (Professor Of Oral and Maxillofacial)
Maryam Jameel Dental Intern
Ghadah Alwahbi Dental Intern
Abstract
The fibroma, also referred to as irritation fibroma, is by far the most common of the oral fibrous tumorlike growths. While the terminology implies a benign neoplasm, most if not all fibromas represent reactive focal fibrous hyperplasia due to trauma or local irritation. Although the term focal fibrous hyperplasia more accurately describes the clinical appearance and pathogenesis of this entity, it is not commonly used. We present a case report of oral fibroma in the left side of the buccal mucosa in 35 years old
Introduction
Fibromas are benign tumors of fibrous connective tissue Their size is usually small and their diameter is rarely larger than 1.5 centimeter . Generally, fibromas are solitary, asymptomatic, sessile lesions, affecting patients between third and sixth decade of life. They are found in 1.2% of adults and they have a 66% female predominance The association between fibromas and trauma is well established. Most of the fibromas of the oral cavity are reactive hyperplasia in response to local irritation or trauma They are common on gingiva, tongue and buccal mucosa . However, although fibromas are common in the oral cavity, their incidence on the hard palate is rare, mainly because of fewer chances of trauma or irritation
Dental traumas considered an increasing public health problem, unlike dental caries that have been declining over the last decades. The majority of dental injuries occur in the anterior region, affecting mainly the maxillary central incisors1 that can have significantly negative functional, esthetic and psychological impact. Prosthetic rehabilitation of traumatized anterior teeth would alter the entire appearance of the patient by providing them with a beautiful smile .
Oral trauma frequently occurs during the life of a young child and adolescent. Often, the consequences of this trauma are minor and may even go unnoticed .
The trauma may affect the hard tissue (alveolar bone, enamel, dentin, and cementum) and adjacent soft tissues.
The dental changes resulting from this clinical occurrence, in general, lead to a reduced quality of life of patients. This occurs because of the sensitivity and also because of the aesthetic conditions, reducing the quality of social life because of reduced self-esteem The aesthetic factor is even more critical considering the standards of beauty socially imposed, where minimal changes in shape, color and/or
positioning have become highly valued.
patient along with preoprative photograph was taken (figure 2)
intraoral examination revealed has generalized calculus and that right central incisor was fracture in middle third of the crown
involving enamle and dentin without pulp exposure ,left central incisor was fracture in meso angle .
oral prophylaxisis was done (figure 3) and dental hygine maintenace instruction were given .
Figure 1
radiographs (IOPA)
figure 2
initial case : generalized calculus and stain
right central incisor was fracture and left central incisor was fracture mesio angle
figure 3
After full ultrasonic scaling and polishing
Figure 4
After 1 week preoprative frontal images .
Figure 5
postoperative frontal images showing
the esthetics result of composite placement ,finishing .
conclusion
In order to achieve and maintain efficient treatment outcomes, the case of a traumatically fractured single central incisor is very challenging for the practitioner. Esthetic and functional results must
be considered when determining the proper treatment plan.
Bicuspidization of Mandibular Molar;A Clinical Review;Case Report Dr.Vivik Periodontics ...